Jim, come on... obviously "the baby" is Sarah's illegitimate child from a previous marriage! Or wait, no! It is the child she aborted! Or, nonono! It is the baby she is preggers with!
It couldn't possibly be something not related to Sarah! Or refer to Sarah herself. No way!!!!!11eleven
Too obvious. The baby is Sarah's mom, who is actually Sarah's child from her secret marriage to her handler. Time travel dontcha know. That and possibly an evil gypsy curse. Also, the handler is Shaw's long lost twin brother. I think his name is probably Brock or Brick or something like that.
Ah, right. And Jill was a biochemist, so obviously she came up with a way to age herself enough to date her own dad in college so that she could make her mom jealous several years later. There might be a minor continuity error in that, but I doubt anyone will notice.
The baby belonged to Sarah and Casey, conceived during a mission in Bahrain. It's currently unknown whether this was a case of maintaining cover or not. I'm guessing not. It was subsequently left in a dumpster (yes, that dumpster), found and "adopted" by Jeff and Lester.
I guess Ladd was the best/most available that they can afford. I haven't seen anything that she's done since Charlie's Angels and I barely watched that. I guess she's okay.
I realized my comment sounds a little insulting. So I wanted to add, that she also looks very beautiful and probably could play quite a bit younger. Although it wouldn´t be a stretch by any means to have Sarah´s mom be 60, if Sarah is supposed to be about 30.
I am quite looking forward to this ep, as it seems to be written by LeFrank and Judkins. And as long as the baby is neither Chuck´s nor Sarah´s secret child, I think I am good with whatever the title might be referring to. :D
Never say Never Mr Razorback. I mean I know the great and powerful Razorback know all and see all and a nobody like me shouldn't have the nerve to question your say. But we will never know. Everyone said Arrested Development would not come back either. But like I said who am I to say
Hmmm...
ReplyDeleteShe's not too bad a choice. Of course, she's no Peggy Lipton, not that I'm obsessed or anything.
ReplyDeleteMy wild guess on the vs. the Baby title: The baby is Sarah, in the sense that having mom around brings out her inner brat.
Jim
Jim, come on... obviously "the baby" is Sarah's illegitimate child from a previous marriage! Or wait, no! It is the child she aborted! Or, nonono! It is the baby she is preggers with!
ReplyDeleteIt couldn't possibly be something not related to Sarah! Or refer to Sarah herself. No way!!!!!11eleven
Too obvious. The baby is Sarah's mom, who is actually Sarah's child from her secret marriage to her handler. Time travel dontcha know. That and possibly an evil gypsy curse. Also, the handler is Shaw's long lost twin brother. I think his name is probably Brock or Brick or something like that.
ReplyDeleteJim
No way... the baby is Jill's that she had when Chuck and her had the sexy sex in an off-screen moment that we will flash back to from season 2.
ReplyDeleteAh, right. And Jill was a biochemist, so obviously she came up with a way to age herself enough to date her own dad in college so that she could make her mom jealous several years later. There might be a minor continuity error in that, but I doubt anyone will notice.
ReplyDeleteJim
The baby belonged to Sarah and Casey, conceived during a mission in Bahrain. It's currently unknown whether this was a case of maintaining cover or not. I'm guessing not. It was subsequently left in a dumpster (yes, that dumpster), found and "adopted" by Jeff and Lester.
ReplyDeleteThat makes some sense since I heard the name of the episode was originally Chuck Vs. The Dumpster Baby.
ReplyDeleteI'm more interested if she will be recurring character or just in one episode. (i hope she will be for more)
ReplyDeleteSiemon
Cheryl Ladd is a nice choice, looking forward to see how good the storyline will turn out to be.
ReplyDeleteI guess Ladd was the best/most available that they can afford. I haven't seen anything that she's done since Charlie's Angels and I barely watched that. I guess she's okay.
ReplyDelete...(spoiler alert) the baby is Hannah's.
I´ve never seen her in anything. Checked out her IMDB page and it looks as if she is a little too old for your taste. ;)
ReplyDeleteThe only other thing that I noticed was that she seems to be really short.
I realized my comment sounds a little insulting. So I wanted to add, that she also looks very beautiful and probably could play quite a bit younger. Although it wouldn´t be a stretch by any means to have Sarah´s mom be 60, if Sarah is supposed to be about 30.
ReplyDeleteI am quite looking forward to this ep, as it seems to be written by LeFrank and Judkins. And as long as the baby is neither Chuck´s nor Sarah´s secret child, I think I am good with whatever the title might be referring to. :D
Is the finale here yet?
ReplyDeleteNBC has moved it(513) to the next TV season. Stealing Syfy's scheduling playbook.
ReplyDeleteAhhh.... so we will get the first 10 episodes in 2011-2012 and then the final 3 in 2013? ;)
ReplyDeleteI'm 99.448% positive Chuck is going to get the Arrested Development treatment 5 years down the road.
ReplyDeleteNah... that ship has sailed. But if CHUCK sells well on DVD/BD? A movie could definitely happen.
ReplyDeleteNever say Never Mr Razorback. I mean I know the great and powerful Razorback know all and see all and a nobody like me shouldn't have the nerve to question your say. But we will never know. Everyone said Arrested Development would not come back either. But like I said who am I to say
ReplyDelete